Monday, July 28, 2008
twosilvertrees

Calexico's new album Carried To Dust is due on September 9th on Touch and Go records.  A taster can be found here: Two Silver Trees

From what I've read so far, and listening to this track, it's sounding good, and a move back to something more like their core sound than Garden Ruin's more mainstream sound (mainstream in a very relative way, obviously!).

I've got my tickets to see them at The Forum in October - they must be getting close to being the band I've seen the most, and I've yet to be disappointed...

New albums are due later this year from Giant Sand and Lambchop, too, so all in all it's a good year for alt-country/americana/whatever-the-hell-it-is... (no, I've never been able to answer the question "what kind of music do they make" about any of these bands!)

Bonus tracks:

Lambchop's "Slipped Dissolved And Loosed"

For a free download of Giant Sand's "Increment of Love" go to http://www.yeproc.com/stash, sign in (or sign up, all you need is an email address!), and enter the code PROVISIONS.

Monday, July 28, 2008 11:18:55 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Friday, July 25, 2008

I don't tend to make political or religious posts on my blog. Let's be honest, I don't make many posts on any subject on my blog! So, please feel free to ignore this post.

However, I wanted to post on this subject. P Z Myers, the author of the blog Pharyngula and biologist at the University of Minnesota, Morris, has (intentionally) got himself into the cross-hairs of Bill Donohue's Catholic League, for the (according to Donohue) heinous crime of desecrating a cracker. The back-story can be found quite easily on Pharyngula, and many other places around the web, so I won't go into it here.

Myers has been taking a lot of abuse for his threats against crackers, with many idiots describing his behaviour as inciting hatred of Catholics, and calling for his dismissal from his position at UMM. As you may be able to tell from my tone so far, I'm entirely on Myers side in this. It is not inciting hatred to say that someone's beliefs are nonsense. It is not inciting hatred to say that they're idiots for believing something ridiculous. It is not inciting hatred to damage a cracker.

It may be inciting ridicule, or scorn, or contempt. But so what? There's no opinion, belief, or practice that people shouldn't be able to treat with ridicule, scorn or contempt. Someone may fervently and honestly believe that the cracker in question is the actual body of their god. Who knows, David Icke may believe the nonsense he spouts as well. I'm also sure that plenty of Daily Mail readers believe the tripe printed in their paper. And I don't see why any of them should be exempt from having the piss taken or their beliefs mocked. No one should.

I completely fail to see why a religious belief is priviledged over any other belief (and there are plenty of far more eloquent discussions on this subject at Butterflies & Wheels than I can make). I see no difference at all between saying that the Bible is a dangerous book, stuffed full of appalling immorality, and providing a lousy guide for how to behave, and making the same statement about the Daily Mail or the Independant, say. I see no difference at all between saying that people are idiots for having religious beliefs and saying that people are idiots for being Tories, Greens, or Socialists.

I'm also with Dawkins in his point that it makes no more sense to talk about a Christian child than it does a Conservative child; both are systems of belief that people either absorb as they're growing up (and in many cases fail to throw off), or they're belief systems that they adopt as adults. In either case, it's a very different thing to an innate characteristic such as the colour of their skin, or their gender, or their sexual orientation, and certainly shouldn't be protected in the same way through anti-discrimination legislation.

Anyway, vent over. This blog shall now return to its normal program of sporadic posting on non-controversial subjects.

Friday, July 25, 2008 3:04:51 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

I can't believe I got a couple wrong...

92%DRUNKARD
Created by OnePlusYou - Online Dating

Via Living the Scientific Life (Scientist, Interrupted)

Friday, July 25, 2008 2:20:16 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Tuesday, July 01, 2008

Two different bands, two different sets, two very different atmospheres...

On Friday night V and I, and a couple of our friends, went to see Bon Jovi at Twickenham Stadium.  As you'd hope, it was very much a greatest hits set, kicking off with Living on a Prayer, and containing almost everything from the Crossroads greatest hits album.

Bon Jovi

Bon Jovi photo by beckygarratt

I couldn't say I was a huge fan; I know the obvious hits, and since V is a fan I'm getting to know more of the album tracks, but I could sing along with at least the choruses on easily more than half the set, so I was quite happy!

Even though I far prefer Springsteen as an artist, I'd have to admit that I enjoyed Bon Jovi's show even more that I did Bruce's last month at the Emirates: the sound was better, the stage set better and more interesting, and the setlist itself was better (even though I think Magic is a better E-Street album than any he's done for many years, it all seems a bit Bruce-by-numbers to me - give me the early stuff any day!).

And then there was last night.

Lou Reed.

Performing Berlin, in its entirety, at the Royal Albert Hall.

Berlin, Live

Slated on its release, Berlin has proved to be Reed's masterpiece, and its live performance lived up to every expectation I had.  I had wondered if it would be as moving and harrowing live as it is on record, and the sense of release after the cathartic ending of Sad Song let me know that it had been...  the rest of the audience seemed to agree with me: the performance earned a standing ovation.

At first I thought the sound was a bit on the politely-quiet side, but when the full band played that certainly wasn't the case.  Behind the band was a simple set (with greenish walls!), onto which was projected images and films to complement the music - so I now know what Caroline looks like.

Reed was joined by a huge band that included a 12-piece choir, 8-piece orchestra, his current touring band, and some faces from the past: Michael Rathke and Steve Hunter on guitar, Rob Wasserman on upright bass, Fernando Saunders on a selection of bass, and Tony "Thunder" Smith on drums.  Steve Bernstien and Jane Scarpantoni provided keyboards and backing vocals.

Berlin took about an hour to perform, and after a short break the band came back for an encore of Satellite of Love, Rock and Roll, and his new song The Power of the Heart (which can be downloaded over here).

Got to get the DVD when it comes out!

Lou Reed

Lou Reed photo by joshkritter

Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:12:36 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |